Blog

We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Implications of Michigan’s New Cannabis Tax Lawsuit

In the landscape of evolving state tax policies, Michigan finds itself embroiled in a significant legal battle regarding a newly introduced 24% wholesale cannabis tax. As the judicial proceedings commence, this case holds importance not only for its impact on marijuana pricing but also for the precedents it could set concerning voter-initiated laws and fiscal strategies nationwide.

Whether you're a cannabis consumer or simply observing from afar, the ramifications of this lawsuit are significant. The decision could dictate future frameworks for cannabis taxation in other states, potentially signaling similar legislative conflicts as the sector expands.

Image 1

Michigan's Tax Proposal: A Closer Look

As a component of the state's 2025–2026 budget, Michigan lawmakers ratified a 24% tax on cannabis transactions at the wholesale level. This measure aims to generate funds for essential road maintenance, impacting costs before products reach dispensaries.

Currently, Michigan imposes two primary taxes:

  • 10% excise tax on consumer purchases of marijuana products (enacted in 2018 by voter approval)
  • 6% state sales tax on all applicable goods

The introduction of this wholesale tax would position Michigan's cannabis tax framework among the most complex in the nation.

Why Challenge the Legislation?

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has raised constitutional challenges against this tax, citing critical points:

The original 2018 law on cannabis laws requires supermajority approval for any amendments.

Recreational cannabis was legalized through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), which protected the statute with a three-fourths legislative supermajority requirement for any alterations.

The current legislative process only achieved a simple majority for the new tax.

Image 2

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol emphasized the significance of defending voter intentions as covered by Michigan Advance:

“Our legal action represents a commitment to uphold the democratic expression of Michigan's electorate.”

The State’s Legislative Defense

Michigan’s legal experts argue for the tax’s legitimacy based on:

  • The tax represents a new initiative rather than a revision of existing laws.
  • The legislature retains authority to enact fiscal measures addressing budgetary necessities.
  • The revenue targets infrastructure enhancement rather than modifying cannabis regulations.

Should the court rule in favor, this regulation will be effective from January 1, 2026.

Impact on Consumers and Beyond

No matter where you reside, this case resonates well beyond Michigan due to its potential to influence national cannabis taxation approaches. Should the tax withstand legal scrutiny:

  • Costs at wholesale and retail will likely increase.
  • Consumers might revert to unregulated channels to avoid higher costs.
  • Smaller retailers could face consolidation pressures.

If negated, Michigan’s current economical tax setup will persevere, serving as a model for other jurisdictions with more cost-efficient cannabis markets.

National Repercussions and Next Steps

While centered in Michigan, the implications of this lawsuit span across the nation:

1. Testing Voter-Law Dynamic

If legislative bodies bypass stringent voter-law safeguards, it might transform ballot initiative processes countrywide.

2. Influencing Tax Frameworks

States juggling budget shortfalls could emulate Michigan’s strategy if it withstands the legal challenge.

3. Highlighting Cannabis Tax Diversity

This case underscores the varied tax landscapes within the cannabis industry, impacting competitive market balance.

Michigan’s legal proceedings could set the stage for future tax-related governance and litigation.

Image 3

The Road Ahead

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has reviewed key arguments, and a decision is imminent with potential escalation to the state’s Supreme Court.

The eventual ruling will have far-reaching repercussions, shaping how states manage legislated public mandates, burgeoning sectors, and tax jurisdiction.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.

Ask me anything! Our Ai Smart Bot Can Assist With Questions You May Have
If you'd prefer a call - click Contact Us Now below
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully